Connect with us

News

Judge to Decide Trump’s Punishment for Breaking Gag Order in Hush Money Trial

As Trump confronts punishment for breaking a gag order, what the trial’s outcome will be could affect his possibilities for being elected again in 2024.

Published

on

U.S. Former President Donald Trump
U.S. Former President Donald Trump. Credit | AP

United States – On Tuesday, a judge on duty to supervise Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial will determine how the former US president should be punished for committing a gag order that forbids him to comment on witnesses and other people related to the trial.

Fine for Trump’s Gag Order Breach

The prosecutors want Justice Juan Merchan to order Trump to pay a certain fine for his onslaught on the adult actress Stormy Daniels and his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who are expected to take testimony. However, they also noted his tweet last week on this subject, which said people are lying about their jury experience so they can avoid conviction, as reported by Reuters.

For example, Merchan could order Trump to pay a one-hundred-dollar fine for every commitment breach, as requested by Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor from the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.

Potential Consequences for Trump

Prosecutors have asked Merchan to remind Trump at the 9:30 a.m. hearing (1330 GMT) that things might get worse if things do not change and he continues to defy the order. For Trump, this means he may be sent to prison for up to 30 days, a twist which may turn out to be a sensational first trial in the US president’s history.

Trump points out a part of the order that prohibits him from talking badly about a witness, a court official, or anyone associated with them, and he claims this is a violation of his right to free speech.

Testimony from Key Witness

A felony charge of falsifying business records is also lodged against Trump over a USD 130,000 payment made through a non-disclosure agreement with Daniels prior to the 2016 elections to keep quiet about her she claims they had in 2006. Trump has claimed that he is not guilty and has denied that such an event has happened.

Prosecutors say it was all part of the larger plan to meet hidden information from voters when he was going through the storm of accusations of misbehavior of a sexual character.

In the allegations leveled on Monday by attorney Matthew Colangelo, “It was election fraud, pure and simple,”

In his own defense opening statement on Monday, lawyer Todd Blanche said Trump did not commit any crime.

Blanche told the jury on Monday: “There’s nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. It’s called democracy,”

 

He said he had acted to shield his family and his image born out of the accusation she falsely made to him before that they had sexual intercourse.

On Tuesday afternoon, beginning at 11 am, the jury will hear from David Pecker, former publisher of the National Enquirer, who prosecutors say joined Trump in the “catch and kill” scheme that was used to block negative stories about Trump from hitting the press and to help him get elected.

Sixty-two-year-old Pecker has testified that he paid for stories – a common practice among journalists.

American Media’s Take

To add, American Media, which acquired the National Enquirer, admitted that it paid USD 150,000 in 2018 to the former Playboy magazine model Karen McDougal to have her talk about the month-long affair that occurred between Trump and herself in 2006 and 2007. American Media said that it worked “all this time together” with the campaign and has never published a story.

The tabloid achieved a comparable deal to pay USD 30,000 to a doorman who was seeking to sell a story about Trump allegedly fathering a child outside the marital off-premises; however, the latter was totally untrue, as prosecutors argued.

Trump has claimed that they were only personal and not an election offense. Another stake he has denied is having an affair with McDougal.

The case can be the only one of Republican Trump’s four impeachments to get a criminal trial before the re-election rematch between Democratic President Joe Biden and Republican President Trump on Nov. 5, as reported by Reuters.

Even if Trump is guilty, it wouldn’t prevent him from being elected. But the verdict might damage his run for the presidency. Reuters surveys indicate that half of independents and a quarter of Republicans will not support Trump’s re-election if he is found guilty of a criminal offense.

News

Hunter Biden’s Ex-Wife to Testify in Firearm Possession Case

The trial will involve whether Hunter Biden falsely stated about his drug use in a bid to buy a pistol: witness accounts from his former wife and former girlfriends.

Published

on

By

Hunter Biden's Ex-Wife Kathleen Buhle


United States – Hunter Biden’s ex-wife is set to testify about what the young Biden’s drug habits were as a defense claim in a case that suggests he lied about them to possess a firearm.

On charges of possession of a firearm by a user of a controlled substance, prosecutors said they would prove that Hunter Biden allowed his anti-drug screening test to come back clean when he purchased a revolver in October 2018, knowing that he was a drug user, as reported by Reuters.

The jurors viewed the text messages, banking records, and some clips of the audiobook of the Then Hunter Biden memoir that the prosecutors say show the client was habitually using crack at the time he bought the gun, one day after the purchase.

“Addiction is not a crime. Lying is,” prosecutor Derek Hines said.

Hunter Biden, 54 years old, has not quit guilty to three felonies, charging him with filing false information while purchasing the gun and possession of the prohibited firearm for 11 days.

The trial comes in the wake of another precedent setting case; the criminal indictment of former President of the United States, Donald Trump, who became the first US president to be convicted of a felony last week. Trump is the Republican candidate for president against Joe Biden of the Democratic party in the Nov. 5 poll.

Something was not mentioned at Hunter Biden’s trial regarding that aspect, but the prosecution used the phrase “no one is above the law.

Testimonies and Defense

Hines said that jurors would hear Kathleen Buhle, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, and his former girlfriend, Zoe Kestan, and Hallie Biden, who was his brother, Beau Biden’s wife. They all can testify about Hunter Biden’s problems with drugs and alcohol throughout the years, Hines noted.

Prosecution’s Evidence and Statements

Lowell, who has represented Hunter Biden in an ongoing grand jury investigation, noted that his client contradicted these claims in his memoir titled “Beautiful Things,” published in 2021. Hunter Biden’s lawyer insisted that the evidence would demonstrate the subject was sober when purchasing the firearm and viewed himself as ‘not a user’ at the time.

Context and Political Backdrop

Trump is expected to be sentenced on July 11th after he was convicted by a jury in the state court in New York last Thursday of 34 felonies of presenting fake documents to conceal payments made to a pornographic actor ahead of a sex scandal that might have had an impact on the build-up to the 2016 U. S. election, as reported by Reuters.

He has denied the allegations in three other ongoing criminal charges, two against him for his attempts to overturn his 2020 defeat by Biden and one for keeping top-secret materials at his Florida estate after his presidency in 2021.

Continue Reading

News

FDA Debate Looms Over MDMA Therapy’s Role in PTSD Treatment

The FDA on MDMA therapy for PTSD is going to usher a new era in the therapeutic management of mental health with implications in treatment for millions of patients with the disorder.

Published

on

By

FDA Debate Looms Over MDMA Therapy's Role in PTSD Treatment


United States – An important meeting on the approval of a new treatment using one of the substances considered hallucinogens is to be held on Tuesday as the advisers to the US Food and Drug Administration are set to deliberate on the therapy based on MDMA for PTSD.

The session, conducted by the independent experts of the agency, is the closest that a drug based on MDMA, commonly referred to as ecstasy or molly, has ever gotten within the FDA procedure for approval, as reported by Reuters.

Addressing Mental Health Needs

This comes after several similar efforts have been pursued by supporters claiming that substances such as MDMA are effective in the treatment of mental health and millions also have other uses that are not related to drug use in society.

The treatment is a capsule containing or containing pure MDMA manufactured by the public-benefit corporation Lykos Therapeutics and to be taken in combination with hourly, full-spectrum sessions of talk therapy by a licensed, entheogenic mental health provider.

Promising Results and Concerns

MDMA, in combination with consultation, has indicated lower PTSD scores in trials with over 190 patients in contrast to placebo.

However, the FDA’s staff reviewers voiced concerns on Friday about how patients suffering from PTSD in the clinical trials knew whether they were given MDMA or a placebo due to the mind-altering effects of the drug.

A Step Towards Innovation

“I don’t think that is as much of a concern because even if it is an enhanced placebo effect, people are still getting better,” said David Olson, director of the UC Davis Institute for Psychedelics and Neurotherapeutics.

“But the bigger question is, what is the risk to those individuals?”

PTSD is among the largely prevalent mental health disorders, which impacts 13 million people within the United States of America and is prevalent among war veterans. This indicates that there is still a big gap in the development of new treatments for PTSD in this regard since the other drugs do not affect every person.

Lykos treatment is one treatment out of many psychedelic drugs given to patients with untreatable mental disorders, including Compass Pathways’ (CMPS. O) drug, which is derived from magic mushrooms.

The agency’s staff discussed restrictions on its use and oversight in briefing documents delivered on Friday. The FDA also pointed out the increase in both blood pressure and pulse in the trials and instances of hepatic toxicity.

According to Olson, the approval could provide “a new way to attack the problem, but as a single agent, it is not going to be a large driver” because of the cost and logistical challenges associated with it, as reported by Reuters.

“It’s important because it would be the first in this class of molecules, but I don’t think it will be the last; it will be replaced by compounds that have superior properties to MDMA.”

Continue Reading

News

British Tech Pioneer Faces Fraud Charges in HP Acquisition Trial

The fraud trial of Lynch is a follow-up on the disastrous HP-Autonomy interface, which has been a significant turning point on the technology as well as corporate governance.

Published

on

By

British Tech Pioneer Faces Fraud Charges in HP Acquisition Trial


United States – Jurors at the trial of British tech pioneer Mike Lynch may hear closing arguments in San Francisco on Monday in the fraud case regarding Hewlett-Packard’s (HPE. N) acquisition of Lynch’s software company Autonomy for USD 11.2 billion in 2011.

The Cambridge University-educated businessman testified for the defense at the trial, explaining that he had no criminal intentions and that HP performed the merger poorly, as reported by Reuters.

HP then proceeded to write down the value of Autonomy by USD 8.8 billion in one year since the acquisition.

Lynch and the former Autonomy finance executive Stephen Chamberlain have been charged with fraud and conspiracy for planning to artificially increase the company’s revenue starting in 2009, in part to attract a buyer.

Allegations of Fraud

Prosecutors claimed the two inflated Autonomy revenue through back-dated transactions and ‘round-trip’ transactions, where money was paid upfront by the customer through a fictitious contract.

During the trial, which started mid-March, the jurors were presented with over thirty government witnesses, including Leo Apotheker, the former HP chief who was dismissed just a few weeks after the purchase of Autonomy was declared.

Lynch’s legal advisors prepared the trial, stating that HP wanted to acquire Autonomy ahead of potential competitors, so the due diligence was performed quickly before the sale was closed.

Lynch Denies Involvement in Accounting Decisions

Taking the stand, Lynch denied that he was involved directly with the accounting decisions at issue and asserted that he was more concerned with technology issues at the time, leaving the finance-related matters in the hands of Sushovan Hussain, Autonomy’s former chief financial officer.

Hussain was convicted in 2018 in the same court in another trial. He was released from U. S. prison in January following his five-year imprisonment term.

Lynch was identified as one of the UK’s leading tech enablers in a bracket that included Steve Jobs of Apple and Bill Gates of Microsoft.

Fallout from Controversial Acquisition Continues

The Autonomy deal was one of the largest British technology deals that was supposed to boost HP’s software segment. Rather, it gave rise to a chain of cruel and costly court proceedings, as reported by Reuters.

Lynch and Hussain were found liable for the defamation in a civil trial in London in 2022, though the amount of the damages remains unconcluded. The company is requesting 4 billion US Dollars in total funding.

Continue Reading

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly in your inbox.

Latest Posts

Trending