Connect with us

News

Controversy Surrounds Biden’s USD 1 Billion Arms Deal with Israel Amid Calls for Palestinian Protection

Biden administration’s decision to send over USD 1 billion in weapons to Israel while bipartisan debates rage over it shows the ongoing efforts to reconcile the US support for Israel’s defense needs with the civilian protection in the conflict zones.

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Joe Biden
Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Joe Biden. Credit | REUTERS


United States: The Biden administration has informed the important lawmakers that it would send over USD 1 billion of additional weapons and ammunition to Israel, three congressional aides said on Tuesday. Nevertheless, it was not immediately discovered how soon the weapons would be delivered.

Background on Arms Hold

This is the first arms shipment to Israel to be made public since the administration put another arms transfer, which consisted of 3,500 bombs, each weighing up to 2,000 pounds, on hold this month. The Biden administration, on the ground, because of the worries about the civilian casualties in Gaza, has said that it stopped the bomb transfer to the Israeli side to keep Israel from using those particular munitions in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, which is very crowded, as reported by Associated Press.

Details of Arms Package

The congressional aides said the package announced on Tuesday is worth about USD 700 million for tank ammunition, USD 500 million for tactical vehicles, and USD 60 million for mortar rounds. They didn’t disclose their identity and spoke anonymously to discuss arms transfer that has not yet been made public.

There was no sign of the time when the arms would be sent. The two congressional aides said that the shipment is not part of the long-delayed foreign aid package that Congress passed, and President Joe Biden signed last month. It was not known if the shipment was the newest batch from the ongoing arms sale or something new.

Bipartisan Views and Criticisms

Both sides of the political spectrum have been against the Biden administration for supporting the military of Israel, which is already fighting the seven-month-old war against Hamas in Gaza, while Biden is facing reelection against former President Donald Trump.

Some of Biden’s Democratic colleagues have urged him to stop the export of offensive weapons to Israel in order to force the U. S. ally to do more for the protection of the Palestinian civilians. The protests on college campuses in the U. S. have made the message this spring really clear.

Republican Support

Republican lawmakers have used the administration’s pause on the bomb transfers as a reason to say that any weakening of the U. S. support for Israel — its main ally in the Middle East — weakens that country as it fights with Hamas and other Iran-backed groups. In the House, they are going to push the bill this week to make it a law that Israel has to deliver the offensive weapons.

Although the first ban on the bomb shipment was lifted, Biden and administration officials have stated that they will still support other weapons deliveries and overall military support to Israel, which is the largest recipient of U. S. military aid.

Biden will see to it that “Israel has all of the military means it needs to defend itself against all of its enemies, including Hamas,” national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters Monday. “For him, this is very straightforward: He’s going to continue to provide Israel with all of the capabilities it needs, but he does not want certain categories of American weapons used in a particular type of operation in a particular place. And again, he has been clear and consistent with that.”

The Wall Street Journal first reported the plans for the USD 1 billion weapons package to Israel.

“I have a general rule of supporting pro-Israel legislation unless it includes a poison pill — like cuts to domestic policy,” he said.

Opposition to Legislative Restrictions

Besides the written veto threat, the White House has been in touch with different lawmakers and congressional aides about the legislation, as an administration official said, as reported by the Associated Press.

“We extremely, extremely oppose attempts to limit the President’s ability to use the American security assistance consistent with the U. S. foreign policy and national security objectives,” Karine Jean-Pierre said this week, adding that the administration is going to spend “every single cent” of the national security supplemental package that was signed into law by Biden last month by Congress.

News

Hunter Biden’s Ex-Wife to Testify in Firearm Possession Case

The trial will involve whether Hunter Biden falsely stated about his drug use in a bid to buy a pistol: witness accounts from his former wife and former girlfriends.

Published

on

By

Hunter Biden's Ex-Wife Kathleen Buhle


United States – Hunter Biden’s ex-wife is set to testify about what the young Biden’s drug habits were as a defense claim in a case that suggests he lied about them to possess a firearm.

On charges of possession of a firearm by a user of a controlled substance, prosecutors said they would prove that Hunter Biden allowed his anti-drug screening test to come back clean when he purchased a revolver in October 2018, knowing that he was a drug user, as reported by Reuters.

The jurors viewed the text messages, banking records, and some clips of the audiobook of the Then Hunter Biden memoir that the prosecutors say show the client was habitually using crack at the time he bought the gun, one day after the purchase.

“Addiction is not a crime. Lying is,” prosecutor Derek Hines said.

Hunter Biden, 54 years old, has not quit guilty to three felonies, charging him with filing false information while purchasing the gun and possession of the prohibited firearm for 11 days.

The trial comes in the wake of another precedent setting case; the criminal indictment of former President of the United States, Donald Trump, who became the first US president to be convicted of a felony last week. Trump is the Republican candidate for president against Joe Biden of the Democratic party in the Nov. 5 poll.

Something was not mentioned at Hunter Biden’s trial regarding that aspect, but the prosecution used the phrase “no one is above the law.

Testimonies and Defense

Hines said that jurors would hear Kathleen Buhle, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, and his former girlfriend, Zoe Kestan, and Hallie Biden, who was his brother, Beau Biden’s wife. They all can testify about Hunter Biden’s problems with drugs and alcohol throughout the years, Hines noted.

Prosecution’s Evidence and Statements

Lowell, who has represented Hunter Biden in an ongoing grand jury investigation, noted that his client contradicted these claims in his memoir titled “Beautiful Things,” published in 2021. Hunter Biden’s lawyer insisted that the evidence would demonstrate the subject was sober when purchasing the firearm and viewed himself as ‘not a user’ at the time.

Context and Political Backdrop

Trump is expected to be sentenced on July 11th after he was convicted by a jury in the state court in New York last Thursday of 34 felonies of presenting fake documents to conceal payments made to a pornographic actor ahead of a sex scandal that might have had an impact on the build-up to the 2016 U. S. election, as reported by Reuters.

He has denied the allegations in three other ongoing criminal charges, two against him for his attempts to overturn his 2020 defeat by Biden and one for keeping top-secret materials at his Florida estate after his presidency in 2021.

Continue Reading

News

FDA Debate Looms Over MDMA Therapy’s Role in PTSD Treatment

The FDA on MDMA therapy for PTSD is going to usher a new era in the therapeutic management of mental health with implications in treatment for millions of patients with the disorder.

Published

on

By

FDA Debate Looms Over MDMA Therapy's Role in PTSD Treatment


United States – An important meeting on the approval of a new treatment using one of the substances considered hallucinogens is to be held on Tuesday as the advisers to the US Food and Drug Administration are set to deliberate on the therapy based on MDMA for PTSD.

The session, conducted by the independent experts of the agency, is the closest that a drug based on MDMA, commonly referred to as ecstasy or molly, has ever gotten within the FDA procedure for approval, as reported by Reuters.

Addressing Mental Health Needs

This comes after several similar efforts have been pursued by supporters claiming that substances such as MDMA are effective in the treatment of mental health and millions also have other uses that are not related to drug use in society.

The treatment is a capsule containing or containing pure MDMA manufactured by the public-benefit corporation Lykos Therapeutics and to be taken in combination with hourly, full-spectrum sessions of talk therapy by a licensed, entheogenic mental health provider.

Promising Results and Concerns

MDMA, in combination with consultation, has indicated lower PTSD scores in trials with over 190 patients in contrast to placebo.

However, the FDA’s staff reviewers voiced concerns on Friday about how patients suffering from PTSD in the clinical trials knew whether they were given MDMA or a placebo due to the mind-altering effects of the drug.

A Step Towards Innovation

“I don’t think that is as much of a concern because even if it is an enhanced placebo effect, people are still getting better,” said David Olson, director of the UC Davis Institute for Psychedelics and Neurotherapeutics.

“But the bigger question is, what is the risk to those individuals?”

PTSD is among the largely prevalent mental health disorders, which impacts 13 million people within the United States of America and is prevalent among war veterans. This indicates that there is still a big gap in the development of new treatments for PTSD in this regard since the other drugs do not affect every person.

Lykos treatment is one treatment out of many psychedelic drugs given to patients with untreatable mental disorders, including Compass Pathways’ (CMPS. O) drug, which is derived from magic mushrooms.

The agency’s staff discussed restrictions on its use and oversight in briefing documents delivered on Friday. The FDA also pointed out the increase in both blood pressure and pulse in the trials and instances of hepatic toxicity.

According to Olson, the approval could provide “a new way to attack the problem, but as a single agent, it is not going to be a large driver” because of the cost and logistical challenges associated with it, as reported by Reuters.

“It’s important because it would be the first in this class of molecules, but I don’t think it will be the last; it will be replaced by compounds that have superior properties to MDMA.”

Continue Reading

News

British Tech Pioneer Faces Fraud Charges in HP Acquisition Trial

The fraud trial of Lynch is a follow-up on the disastrous HP-Autonomy interface, which has been a significant turning point on the technology as well as corporate governance.

Published

on

By

British Tech Pioneer Faces Fraud Charges in HP Acquisition Trial


United States – Jurors at the trial of British tech pioneer Mike Lynch may hear closing arguments in San Francisco on Monday in the fraud case regarding Hewlett-Packard’s (HPE. N) acquisition of Lynch’s software company Autonomy for USD 11.2 billion in 2011.

The Cambridge University-educated businessman testified for the defense at the trial, explaining that he had no criminal intentions and that HP performed the merger poorly, as reported by Reuters.

HP then proceeded to write down the value of Autonomy by USD 8.8 billion in one year since the acquisition.

Lynch and the former Autonomy finance executive Stephen Chamberlain have been charged with fraud and conspiracy for planning to artificially increase the company’s revenue starting in 2009, in part to attract a buyer.

Allegations of Fraud

Prosecutors claimed the two inflated Autonomy revenue through back-dated transactions and ‘round-trip’ transactions, where money was paid upfront by the customer through a fictitious contract.

During the trial, which started mid-March, the jurors were presented with over thirty government witnesses, including Leo Apotheker, the former HP chief who was dismissed just a few weeks after the purchase of Autonomy was declared.

Lynch’s legal advisors prepared the trial, stating that HP wanted to acquire Autonomy ahead of potential competitors, so the due diligence was performed quickly before the sale was closed.

Lynch Denies Involvement in Accounting Decisions

Taking the stand, Lynch denied that he was involved directly with the accounting decisions at issue and asserted that he was more concerned with technology issues at the time, leaving the finance-related matters in the hands of Sushovan Hussain, Autonomy’s former chief financial officer.

Hussain was convicted in 2018 in the same court in another trial. He was released from U. S. prison in January following his five-year imprisonment term.

Lynch was identified as one of the UK’s leading tech enablers in a bracket that included Steve Jobs of Apple and Bill Gates of Microsoft.

Fallout from Controversial Acquisition Continues

The Autonomy deal was one of the largest British technology deals that was supposed to boost HP’s software segment. Rather, it gave rise to a chain of cruel and costly court proceedings, as reported by Reuters.

Lynch and Hussain were found liable for the defamation in a civil trial in London in 2022, though the amount of the damages remains unconcluded. The company is requesting 4 billion US Dollars in total funding.

Continue Reading

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly in your inbox.

Latest Posts

Trending